|
If A Conservative Government Believes in the Marketplace, Why Does it
Give Public Property Away Free--or Close To It?
For That Matter, Why Did a Liberal Government?
PBS' NOW Explores Oil and Gas Royalties
As oil and gas companies continue to make enormous profits in a time
of record-high gas prices, watchdog groups are accusing these
companies of shortchanging American taxpayers out of billions of
dollars in royalties for drilling rights on public property. Members
of Congress are also being blamed for making sweetheart deals with Big
Oil engineered to avoid the payment of royalties.
"These oil companies along with some members of Congress have really
engineered one of the greatest train robberies of all time," says
California Congressman George Miller.
You might not realize it, but American taxpayers own some very
valuable property, some of it located in the deep waters of the Gulf
of Mexico. If oil and gas companies want to drill on this territory
they are required to lease it out from the U.S. government, which
collects royalties from them on the taxpayers' behalf.
Big Money
It's no paltry sum. Royalties from oil and gas exploration are the
government's second largest source of revenue, behind income tax.
"I think the American taxpayers are losing billions of dollars," Kevin
Gambrell, former director of the Federal Indian Minerals Office in
Farmington, New Mexico, told NOW.
Gambrell worked for seven years collecting royalties from petroleum
companies working on federal and Native American lands in the Four
Corners region.
"I think oil and gas companies were always trying to figure out how
not to pay royalties or to pay as little as possible," Gambrell said.
He said he caught many oil and gas companies lying and cheating to
avoid paying the full royalties owed. He adds that when he tried to go
after a company for the royalties they owed, he received phone calls
from Congressional offices leaning on him to side with industry.
The Royalty Treatment
Back in 1995, Congress passed the Deep Water Royalty Relief Act that
reduced the amount of royalties oil and gas companies had to pay. At
the time, when gas prices were fairly low, the move was seen by many
as an incentive to get petroleum companies to drill for oil and
natural gas and keep energy production inside the United States.
Since then, a number of other royalty relief measures have been
passed, such as the one included in the most recent energy bill,
signed last summer, which increased the amount of oil that can be
drilled without paying royalties.
Royalty relief under the 1995 act could cost taxpayers up to $80
billion over the next twenty-five years, depending upon the outcome of
an industry lawsuit, according to a recent draft report by the
Government Accountability Office. This includes a mistake by the
government when drawing up some of the royalty agreements, which could
cost $10 billion.
Who's following the money, and who's keeping it? Get ready for a crude
awakening. Next time on NOW.
Related Links:
Statement by Walter Cruickshank, Deputy Director, Minerals Management Service, United States Department of the Interior, before the Committee on Government Reform, Subcommittee on Energy and Resources, United States House or Representatives, March 1, 2006. [Requires Adobe Reader]
Statement by the Kerr-McGee Corporation, an oil company that has sued the Bush administration to expand royalty relief. [Requires Adobe Reader]
Government Accountablity Office: Briefing on Oil and Gas Royalties, March 27, 2006 [Requires Adobe Reader]
Report of the National Energy Policy Development Group, May 2001 [3MB - Requires Adobe Reader]
Department of the Interior, Audit of the Minerals Management Service, March 2003 [2MB - Requires Adobe Reader]
NOW: Crude Behavior: An investigation on the oil industry
From http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/224/index.html
|